A Big Social Security Change Just Signed by President Biden Comes With Bad News for Retirees

 A Big Social Security Change Just Signed by President Biden Comes With Bad News for Retirees

President Joe Biden recently signed into law the Social Security Fairness Act, legislation that expands benefits for nearly 3 million public-sector workers.

Please Subscribe to our channel. 

The Social Security Fairness Act eliminates two pre-existing rules: the Windfall Elimination Provision and the Government Pension Offset.

The Congressional Budget Office estimates the new law brings potential benefit cuts forward by six months, while also increasing the size of those potential cuts.

The $22,924 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook

On Jan. 5, President Joe Biden signed into law the Social Security Fairness Act. That means nearly 3 million public-sector workers with government pensions will receive larger Social Security benefits, with the average increase estimated at $360 per month. But the new law also comes with bad news for beneficiaries.

The Social Security trust fund that pays benefits to retired workers, spouses, and survivors was already on pace to be depleted by 2033. That means automatic benefit cuts (without Congressional intervention) were less than a decade away. But the Social Security Fairness Act brings those cuts even closer by increasing program spending.

The Social Security Fairness Act eliminates two pre-existing rules

The Social Security Fairness Act eliminates two pre-existing rules: the Windfall Elimination Provision and the Government Pension Offset.

The Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) reduced benefits for workers who had one job that did not withhold Social Security taxes and another job that did. The WEP commonly affected public-sector workers such as firefighters, police officers, and teachers that also held private-sector jobs. The WEP prevented a "windfall in benefits for individuals who have only minimal Social Security coverage," according to the Social Security Administration.

The Government Pension Offset (GPO) reduced Social Security benefits for spouses and survivors who also receive pensions from federal, state, or local governments. It ensured "government employees who do not pay Social Security taxes are treated in a manner similar to those who work in the private sector and pay Social Security taxes," according to the Social Security Administration.

Some policy experts argue the WEP and GPO were unfair because they reduced benefits for retired workers and spouses who chose to serve their communities. Alternatively, other experts argue the WEP and GPO were entirely fair because they prevented retired workers and spouses from double dipping from Social Security and government pensions.

The Social Security Fairness Act comes with bad news for retired workers

The Social Security Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund pays retirement, spousal, and survivors benefits. Before President Biden signed the Social Security Fairness Act into law, the OASI Trust Fund was expected to be insolvent by 2033, at which point only 79% of scheduled benefits would have been payable.

Importantly, that does not mean Social Security is going bankrupt, nor does it mean benefit payments will stop. Instead, it means benefits will be cut by at least 21% unless Congress finds a way to increase funding for the program before the trust fund is depleted.

However, the Social Security Fairness act will increase benefit payments for about 3 million public-sector workers. While that is undoubtedly good news for those individuals, it is also bad news for retired workers and other recipients. When the trustees estimated the OASI Trust Fund would be depleted in 2033, they did not account for expanded benefits under the new law.

Consequently, the Social Security Fairness Act not only hastens benefit cuts, but it also increases the size of the projected cuts. The Congression Budget Office estimates the law will accelerate trust fund depletion by approximately six months, and that it will increase the minimum necessary benefit cut to 26% once the OASI Trust Fund is insolvent.

Here is the bottom line: Congress will likely find a solution for Social Security's financing problem before benefit cuts happen automatically. But the Social Security Fairness Act raises the stakes. It brings potential benefit cuts closer, meaning Congress has less time to find a solution. It also increases program spending, which means Congress must now surmount an even greater funding shortfall.

The $22,924 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook

If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $22,924 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Simply click here to discover how to learn more about these strategies.

President Joe Biden Signs the Social Security Fairness Act: A Boon for Public-Sector Workers but a Concern for Retirees.

On January 5, 2025, President Joe Biden enacted the Social Security Fairness Act into law, marking a significant shift in how Social Security benefits are distributed among public-sector workers. Nearly 3 million public-sector workers, including firefighters, police officers, and teachers, stand to gain from this new legislation. The act eliminates two controversial rules—the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and the Government Pension Offset (GPO)—resulting in larger monthly Social Security benefits for these workers. While this is undoubtedly positive news for those affected, the new law has sparked concerns about its impact on the overall solvency of the Social Security system.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has projected that the Social Security Fairness Act will accelerate the depletion of the Social Security Trust Fund, which could lead to earlier and more significant benefit cuts for retirees across the nation. This development underscores the urgency for Congress to address Social Security's funding challenges and find long-term solutions.

Understanding the Social Security Fairness Act:

The Social Security Fairness Act addresses long-standing complaints about the WEP and GPO, two provisions that many argued unfairly penalized public-sector workers. Here's a closer look at these rules and the changes introduced by the new law:

The Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP):

The WEP was designed to prevent individuals from receiving disproportionately high Social Security benefits due to their work history in both Social Security-covered and non-covered jobs. For instance, a teacher who worked a second job in the private sector would have seen their Social Security benefits reduced under the WEP because their primary job did not contribute to Social Security taxes. This provision aimed to ensure fairness by adjusting benefits for workers with mixed employment histories.

However, critics argued that the WEP unfairly reduced benefits for individuals who served their communities in public-sector roles. For example, a firefighter or police officer who contributed to a government pension system but also worked in a Social Security-covered job could face significant reductions in their benefits, even if they had contributed adequately to Social Security in their secondary employment.

The Government Pension Offset (GPO):

The GPO targeted spouses and survivors who received pensions from government jobs not covered by Social Security. This provision reduced spousal or survivor benefits by two-thirds of the government pension amount. The rationale was to prevent "double-dipping," where individuals could potentially receive full Social Security benefits in addition to their government pensions.

While the GPO was intended to maintain equity between public-sector employees and private-sector workers who paid into Social Security throughout their careers, it often resulted in significant financial challenges for retirees and their families. For example, a widow receiving a government pension might have seen her survivor benefits reduced to a fraction of what she expected, leaving her with limited income during retirement.

The Impact of the Social Security Fairness Act:

By eliminating the WEP and GPO, the Social Security Fairness Act ensures that public-sector workers and their families receive more equitable treatment under the Social Security system. The average increase in benefits is estimated at $360 per month, providing much-needed financial relief to millions of individuals. However, this positive change comes at a cost to the overall stability of the Social Security program.

Accelerated Trust Fund Depletion:

The Social Security Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund, which finances benefits for retirees, spouses, and survivors, was already facing insolvency by 2033. Without intervention, this would result in automatic benefit cuts of approximately 21%. However, the expanded benefits introduced by the Social Security Fairness Act have expedited this timeline.

The CBO estimates that the OASI Trust Fund will now be depleted six months earlier than previously projected, potentially as early as mid-2033. Furthermore, the magnitude of the necessary benefit cuts has increased from 21% to 26%, meaning retirees could face even greater financial challenges if Congress fails to address the funding shortfall.

Increased Program Spending:

The elimination of the WEP and GPO significantly increases Social Security's expenditures. While this is beneficial for public-sector workers, it also exacerbates the program's financial strain. Policymakers now face the dual challenge of addressing the accelerated timeline for trust fund depletion and the heightened funding gap.

The Broader Implications for Social Security:

The Social Security Fairness Act highlights the delicate balance between addressing fairness concerns and maintaining the program's solvency. On one hand, the legislation rectifies perceived injustices in how benefits were calculated for public-sector workers. On the other hand, it underscores the urgent need for comprehensive reform to ensure the program's long-term viability.

Key Challenges Ahead:

1. Funding Shortfalls: Social Security's primary source of funding is payroll taxes. With the retirement of the baby boomer generation and increasing life expectancy, the program faces a growing imbalance between contributions and benefit payments. The Social Security Fairness Act exacerbates this issue by increasing expenditures without corresponding increases in revenue.

2. Political Gridlock: While there is broad recognition of the need for Social Security reform, political disagreements often hinder progress. The accelerated timeline for trust fund depletion adds pressure on lawmakers to find a solution quickly.

3. Impact on Retirees: The prospect of benefit cuts looms large for retirees who depend on Social Security as a primary source of income. The increased likelihood and severity of cuts could have significant implications for millions of Americans, particularly those with limited retirement savings.

Potential Solutions:

Policymakers have proposed various strategies to address Social Security's funding challenges, including:

• Raising Payroll Taxes: Increasing the payroll tax rate or eliminating the income cap on taxable earnings could generate additional revenue for the program.
• Adjusting Benefits: Modifying the formula used to calculate benefits, such as increasing the retirement age or changing the cost-of-living adjustment (COLA), could reduce expenditures.
• Expanding Coverage: Extending Social Security coverage to currently excluded groups, such as some public-sector workers, could broaden the program's revenue base.

The Social Security Fairness Act is a double-edged sword. While it addresses fairness concerns for public-sector workers, it also amplifies the urgency of Social Security's funding crisis. Congress must act decisively to ensure the program's sustainability and protect retirees from significant benefit cuts.

What Retirees Can Do?

In the face of uncertainty, retirees and future beneficiaries should take proactive steps to secure their financial futures. This includes:

1. Maximizing Benefits: Understanding Social Security's rules and strategies for optimizing benefits can significantly impact retirement income. For example, delaying retirement until age 70 can result in higher monthly payments.
2. Diversifying Income Sources: Relying solely on Social Security can be risky. Building a diversified portfolio of savings, investments, and other income sources can provide greater financial stability.
3. Staying Informed: Keeping abreast of legislative developments and policy changes is essential for making informed decisions about retirement planning.

The Social Security Fairness Act represents a significant step forward for public-sector workers, providing them with enhanced benefits and addressing longstanding grievances. However, it also accelerates the challenges facing the Social Security system, bringing potential benefit cuts closer and increasing their severity.

As lawmakers grapple with these issues, the stakes are higher than ever for retirees and future beneficiaries. While the Social Security Fairness Act brings immediate relief to millions, it underscores the critical need for comprehensive reform to ensure the program's long-term sustainability and protect the financial security of all Americans.

In the meantime, individuals must take proactive steps to maximize their benefits and plan for the future, navigating the complexities of a system that remains a cornerstone of retirement security in the United States.