VICTORY ASSURED!! "Shocking 2024 Electoral Map - IN ALL 50 STATES!

Today I want to talk about a crucial issue for all of us: the influence of the Latino vote in the US presidential election. Did you know that in the 2020 elections, the Latino community was the minority group that participated most? And more importantly, did you know that the Latino vote, which is counted in the millions, could be the key to deciding who will be the next president of the United States?

Before starting, please subscribe to my channel.

With this video, my goal is to show you data and evidence that demonstrates the enormous impact our Latino community has on voting. In addition, I want it to be clear that, based on this data, candidates should engage much more with our Hispanic-American community, as the outcome of the elections could literally be in our hands.

So, before I go into detail, I want to ask you two very quick things. First, to like this video so that YouTube continues to share it with more people. And second, if you haven't signed up yet, I invite you to do so. In this channel I will continue to provide up-to-date information about the elections, explaining how it affects us both positively and negatively.

Now, as a matter goes into the matter, the number of Latinos eligible to vote has grown significantly between 2016 and 2024. In 2016, there were 27 million Latinos eligible to vote, but by 2024 this figure is estimated to reach 36 million.36 million Latinos can vote! This is an impressive fact when you consider that some candidates have won states with less than one million votes. This means that if a percentage of those Latinos who don't usually vote were to mobilize, they could change the outcome of an election. Perhaps his preferred candidate would have won if more Latinos had exercised their right to vote.

Now, let's look at a table that illustrates the percentage of Latinos eligible to vote in each state. When compared to the electoral map, we can get a sense of where the Latino vote is leaning. For example, in New Mexico, 45% of people eligible to vote are Latino. New Mexico traditionally leans toward Democrats, suggesting that Latinos in this state may be more inclined to vote for Democratic candidates.

If we go to Florida, a key state in the election, we see that 22% of eligible voters are Latino. Unlike New Mexico, Florida is a state that in recent years has leaned toward Republicans, with many Latinos supporting Donald Trump. This is a good example that not all Latinos vote the same way. In Texas, another major state, 32% of eligible voters are Latino. Although Texas has been a Republican state since the Jimmy Carter era, the growing number of Latino voters has made every election look carefully.

California, on the other hand, has a very high percentage of Latino voters, about 33%. However, California is a state that has been consistently Democratic, with most Latinos voting for candidates from this party, as Kamala Harris could be. Interestingly, California is home to a quarter of all eligible Latino voters in the United States, equivalent to 8.5 million people.

Another state that deserves attention is Arizona, where 25% of eligible voters are Latino. Arizona is a disputed state, where elections sometimes favor Republicans and sometimes Democrats. According to current polls, Donald Trump is leading in this state. In Nevada, 22% of voters are Latino, and this is another disputed state. Current polls show a tie between Trump and Kamala Harris, which means that Latino voters could decide the outcome in Nevada.

What these examples show us is that Latinos have decisive power in this election. Latinos who vote in states like Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico and California will have a huge influence on who will be the next president of the United States. In states like New Jersey, where 16 percent of voters are Latino, most seem to be leaning toward the Democratic Party. In Illinois, 13 percent of voters are Latino, and this is another state that tends to vote for Democrats.

However, there are states with lower percentages of Latino voters, such as some southern states, which are usually Republican strongholds. Here, the Latin influence is less, but that doesn't mean it's not significant. Every year, about 1.4 million Hispanics in the United States get the right to vote, and although Donald Trump gained ground among Latino voters in 2020, the majority still voted for Joe Biden.

If we look at a graph of the Hispanic population eligible to vote in 2024, it is projected that there will be 36.2 million Latino voters. This is an increase of almost 4 million over the 2020 elections. In addition, Latinos represent the largest minority among eligible voters, surpassing other groups such as people of color and voters of Asian origin. Although minority groups account for only 3% of total voters, that percentage, which translates into millions of people, could be the difference in a closed election.

With these data, it has been demonstrated that the Latino vote is fundamental in the 2024 elections. We Latinos could be the ones to define this presidential race. Whether Donald Trump or Kamala Harris wins will depend largely on us. Now, let's take a look at the 2024 election map, based on the averages of the most recent polls published in each state, to see how Donald Trump and Kamala Harris are positioned on their way to the 270 electoral votes needed to win.

The yellow states shown on the map are the most competitive at the moment and could determine the end result of the elections. We'll start with the west area. In Washington, which has 12 electoral votes, current polls show Kamala Harris with a significant lead over Donald Trump, leading by margins of 21, 14 and up to 31 points. This suggests that Washington is a safe state for Kamala Harris.

In Oregon, with eight electoral votes, Kamala Harris also has a five-point, albeit tighter, lead. This state was won by Joe Biden in 2020 and Hillary Clinton in 2016 with significant margins, so it seems likely that it will also remain in the Democratic column in this election.

In California, which is a deciding state with 55 electoral votes, Kamala Harris has an even bigger lead, leading by more than 20 points in several polls. With California insured for Kamala Harris, she would already have a total of 74 electoral votes.

By contrast, in Idaho, with four electoral votes, Donald Trump has a considerable advantage, as in Montana and Wyoming, traditionally Republican states. These states remain strong points for the Republican Party and seem safe for Trump.

This analysis shows us how the electoral map is being configured at this stage of the campaign. As I mentioned earlier, Latino voters have the power to tip the balance in many key states. So my message to everyone in our Latino community is clear: go out and vote!

In the last election, specifically in 2020, Donald Trump won a victory in the state of Florida with 43.4% of the vote against Joe Biden. Compared to 2016, Trump won Florida at 46.3%, representing a significant advantage. So, there's no need to conduct polls in this state, and you can expect that Florida's 29 electoral votes would go to Trump. So far, the electoral vote count stands at 74 for Kamala Harris and 11 for Trump. Let us remember that it takes 270 electoral votes to win the presidency.

Continuing with the state of Utah, which provides six electoral votes, recent polls show Trump leading with margins of 32%, 26%, 29% and 32%. This lead is also considerable, so Utah is assigned to Trump, adding his six electoral votes to those already counted.

We are now heading to the state of Colorado, where there are 10 electoral votes. Recent polls indicate that Kamala Harris is ahead by margins of 10 and 15 points. In 2020, Biden got a 13.5% lead over Trump, and in 2016, Hillary Clinton won by 4.9%. Although Colorado is not a solid blue state, it is considered relatively safe for Harris, so those 10 electoral votes are allocated to it.

Moving to New Mexico, which has five electoral votes, polls indicate that Harris is leading by margins of 10, 5, 7, 11, 7 and 6. Given that he has won all the polls, those five electoral votes are allocated to Kamala Harris.

Up to this point, the situation is as follows: Donald Trump has 17 electoral votes and Kamala Harris has 89. We now move to North Dakota, where no polls have been conducted, but in 2020 Trump won with 33.4% and in 2016 with 35.7%, which makes North Dakota a safe state for him, adding three more electoral votes to his account.

Similarly, South Dakota has not had recent polls; Trump won this state in 2020 by 26.2% and in 2016 by 29.8%, so those six electoral votes are also allocated to Trump.

Now, as for Nebraska, we know that their electoral votes are distributed among their districts. Currently, there is a district that votes Democratic and the rest of the state is Republican. The latest polls show that the second district is still in favor of Kamala Harris, where she is ahead by five points. In the rest of Nebraska, Trump leads by 17 points. In 2020, Biden won the second district by 6.6%, while Trump won the rest of the state with a 53% lead. Thus, Kamala Harris has an electoral vote from this district, which is crucial to her strategy of reaching the necessary 270 votes.

Now, reviewing Kansas, this state has no recent polls, but in 2020, Trump won by a margin of 14.6%, and in 2016, with 20.6%. So, Kansas' six electoral votes go to Trump, increasing his total to 33.

Moving to Oklahoma, which has seven electoral votes, polls show that Trump has 16 points ahead, so these votes will go to him as well.

In Texas, a crucial state that provides 40 electoral votes, the latest polls favor Trump with margins of 4%, 8%, 3%, 5%, 9% and 8%. In 2020, Trump won Texas by 5.6% and in 2016 by 9 points. Texas is a state that could be at stake if Republicans do not continue to work to maintain their support, as the Republican advantage is now relatively narrow.

With this, the vote count rises to 90 for Kamala Harris and 80 for Donald Trump. Now, heading north towards Minnesota, which has 10 electoral votes, polls show Harris ahead by 7, 7, 4, 7, 5 and 0. This was a state that Biden won by 7 points in 2020, and Hillary Clinton won it by 1.5% in 2016. So, these 10 votes are allocated to Harris.

In Iowa, which has six electoral votes, Trump leads in two four- and six-point polls. Iowa was won by Trump by 8.2% in 2020 and by 9.4% in 2016, so those six votes are allocated to Trump.

In Missouri, with 10 electoral votes, all recent polls show Trump ahead by margins of 12, 9, 11, 17 and 13 points, securing those 10 votes for him.

In Arkansas, which has six votes, Trump has a 15-point lead in the polls, which means that these votes are also in his favor.

Louisiana, which has eight electoral votes, has not had recent polls, but Trump won this state in 2016 and 2020 by margins of 19.6% and 18.6%, respectively, thus giving eight more electoral votes to Trump.

With this, the count is now 100 electoral votes for Kamala Harris and 110 for Donald Trump.

In Mississippi, which awards six electoral votes, there have also been no recent polls, but Trump won this state by 16.5% in 2020 and by 17.8% in 2016. This secures another six votes for Trump.

In Alabama, without recent polls, Trump won 27.7% in 2016 and 25.5% in 2020, making him a safe state for him, giving him nine more votes.

Now, Florida, with 30 electoral votes, is a crucial state. So far, five polls indicate that Trump is ahead in all of them, with margins of 3, 6, 2, 4 and more. Florida was won by Trump by 3.4% in 2020 and by 1.2% in 2016. So, for now, those 30 electoral votes go to Trump.

This brings the count to 100 electoral votes for Kamala Harris and 155 for Donald Trump.

Now, moving northeast, we start with New Hampshire, which awards four electoral votes. All the polls in New Hampshire show Kamala Harris going ahead by margins of 11, 8, 5 and 7, so those four votes are allocated to Harris.

In Vermont, with three electoral votes, the polls have Harris ahead by 41% and 40%, which is significantly broad, so those three votes go to it.

In Connecticut, which has seven electoral votes, no recent polls have been conducted, but in the previous elections, Clinton won by a margin of 13.6% in 2016 and Biden won it by 20% in 2020. So Connecticut is a blue state that will give its seven votes to Harris.

In New Jersey, which has 14 votes, there have been no recent polls, but Biden won this state by 15.9% and Clinton by 14.1%, so those 14 electoral votes are also allocated to Harris.

Delaware, with three votes, has not had recent polls, but Biden won 19% in 2020 and Clinton 11.4% in 2016, making it a state that will allocate its three votes to Harris.

Maryland, which awards 10 votes, has all recent pro-Kamala Harris polls, with margins of 28%, 31% and 32%, so these 10 votes will go to it.

Washington, D.C., which has three electoral votes, hasn't had recent polls either, but it's an area that Clinton won 86.8% and Biden 86%, so those three votes are allocated to Harris.

Massachusetts, with 11 electoral votes, shows Harris going ahead by 31 points, so those 11 votes go to her. Rhode Island, which has four votes, also shows Harris with a 20-point lead, so those four votes add up to his total.

Finally, in Maine, votes are divided between districts. In the second district, Trump is ahead, while the rest of the state is assigned to Harris. In 2020, Trump won the second district by 7.4% and the rest went to Biden by 23.1%. So, one district is assigned to Trump and the rest to Harris, bringing the count to 162 electoral votes for Harris and 156 for Trump.

Now, we continue to New York, which has 28 very important electoral votes. All surveys indicate that Kamala Harris is ahead

by 16 points. In 2020, Biden won this state by 23.6% and in 2016, Hillary won by 21.6%. So those 28 electoral votes go to Harris, bringing it to 190 votes.

In reviewing the results, Trump has 156 and Kamala Harris has 190 votes. Finally, we find California's 55 electoral votes. Polls indicate that Harris is leading by 20 points. In 2020, Biden won California by 29.2% and in 2016, Hillary won it by 30.1%. So, those 55 electoral votes are allocated to Kamala Harris.

The conclusion of this analysis is clear: electoral dynamics are changing, and as elections approach, it is crucial to continue monitoring key states and their respective margins of support for both candidates. Current projections suggest that Kamala Harris is heading for a solid path to victory, while Donald Trump faces challenges in several states he previously considered safe.